Tribute to Dorothy Heathcote

16 October 2011 –

I have said before that you can’t use relative terms in describing good and bad teachers. It’s not as if they are even engaged in the same activity.  Bad teachers rob you of your abilities and confidence. Good teachers draw out your talents and encourage self belief. Then there are the select few, great teachers who are beacons in the darkness.

There is no finer ambition than striving to be a great teacher. They are rare and you are lucky if you meet just one in your lifetime. I was lucky. When I was a young teacher in Newcastle, I had the good fortune to meet Dorothy Heathcote. I first met her when I was 25. She has been a profound influence on me for the past 45 years. Her death last week leaves a huge void. She is, quite simply, irreplaceable.  Below is an obituary which you can find on the Mantle of the Expert website.

‘It is difficult to grasp how the 14-year-old girl who entered a Yorkshire woollen mill to work in 1940 could become a key international figure in the world of education and drama and yet by the age of 24 she had become a lecturer at the Newcastle-upon-Tyne campus of Durham University, beginning a career that was to span 60 years. In that time she became the inspiration and role model for generations of teachers across the world who recognised in her unique approach the means by which to profoundly engage students and young people with their learning.

It was in 1945 that the headlines in the Yorkshire Post announced: ‘Weaver Gets Chance of Stage Career’ and, indeed, Dorothy trained as an actress, her fees paid for by the mill manager. But, much as she enjoyed acting, her vision extended beyond the stage to the use of theatre as an educational construct. She instinctively recognised the natural human predisposition to use drama as a means of exploring and understanding the world and of developing the fundamental life skills needed for it. With that recognition, Dorothy set herself the task of translating her vision into a classroom practice for all ages that continues to be inspirational to millions.

Her gift was in being able to touch people and give everything she knew away to those who were interested. Her legacy is that so many were interested and, standing on her shoulders, they continue the work of a genius who is for many, the greatest drama teacher of all.

Dorothy remained at Newcastle when it became a university in its own right in 1962. From the School of Education there, word of the charismatic young drama teacher soon began to spread. Her openness of spirit and radical, new pedagogy drew a stream of postgraduate students to Newcastle. She generously welcomed many into her own home and her husband, Raymond and their daughter, Marianne, became used to sharing the house with an annually changing group of temporary residents from home and abroad.

Dorothy created a whole school of drama practice based around the teacher shifting her pedagogy from that of an instructor to inductor, coach, facilitator and fellow artist, recognising the potency for learning of a co-creative process in which learners are empowered. She created a vocabulary of terminology such as drama for learning, drama conventions, teacher in and out of role, secondary role, Rolling Role, Chamber Theatre, Frame, Signing, Mantle of the Expert and Commissioning that is now in the canon of world-wide dramatic teaching expertise and curriculum models pioneered by her deeply held mission to bring joy and challenge into learning.

As her students returned to their places of work, Dorothy’s influence was carried with them and this precipitated an enduring torrent of invitations to work with children, young people, teachers and students across the globe. She accepted them, pioneering the use of drama as a learning process for the world in a wide range of contexts, for example, in townships such as Soweto in South Africa; in New Zealand with Maori communities; in the depths of inner cities in the UK, and in numerous countries throughout Europe, Asia, Africa, North America and Australasia. She also worked in borstal institutions in the UK and USA; in residential care homes and learning centres for people with significant disability; in special schools and with those who work with very vulnerable people. Even during her final illness, she found creative ways of contributing; through video-conferencing, for example.

However, wherever Dorothy was working in the world she always tried to catch the earliest flight home, and remained ‘Dorothy the home-maker’. Her heart was first and foremost with her family; to her neighbours and close friends she was always ‘Dorothy the cook, the bread-maker, the seamstress, the gardener’. She was famous for rising early to prepare for the day alongside her favourite cat and the AGA. She always had a book with her wherever she went, and was an avid letter writer. She loved family days out at National Trust properties and going to the theatre, and supported her granddaughter, Anna, in all her theatrical and dancing endeavours.

In Newcastle, her pioneering methods reached the Medical School where many films focussing on dramatic reconstructing of medical issues were used in the training of medics. Similarly, she became engaged with British Gas senior managers who had become aware of the methods and adopted structures using dramatic contexts to teach their managerial staff new skills for the workplace. This relationship was soon followed by others with Volkswagen, UK, the NHS and more recently with the Crown Prosecution Service and the professional theatre.

Dorothy’s was an endlessly engaged and enquiring mind with a creativity of thought that enabled her to see the connections between her work and that of others across a spectrum of disciplines. She was never complacent and until very shortly before her death was continuing to develop and refine her practice. This resulted in a richly textured pedagogy with a density of resonance that excited and inspired both the participants in her dramas and all those who strove and continue to strive to emulate them.

Her accolades have also been many, resulting in honorary doctorates from The University of Newcastle-upon-Tyne and the University of Derby; honours from and patronage of national and international professional bodies, such as National Drama and NATD; invitations to address the most prestigious gatherings, especially in New York; and of course through her writings and collaborations with her eminent students who had reached similar heights through her training. As early as 1974 the BBC produced a remarkable film about her practice, Three Looms Waiting, which can still be found on UTube. She was awarded an MBE in the Queen’s Birthday Honours list on 11th June 2011, which she was due to collect at Buckingham Palace on 18th October. Knowing that she had already received the honour, it was her wish for her family – who have carried the name Heathcote forward through two more generations – to collect the medal posthumously.

Addressing a gathering of teachers she once remarked, “I shall look forward to death” and when people gasped she said cheerily “not in any morbid sense of course, but rather as looking forward to the greatest and most mysterious adventure of all”. Dorothy’s ‘adventure’ began on 8th October 2011 when she died as a result of the blood disorder, MD’ (Source: www.mantleoftheexpert.com)

For more on Dorothy visit the ‘Mantle of the Expert’ website and follow the leads. You can also look her up on You Tube and watch the BBC documentary Three Looms Waiting‘. For teachers, directors, or anyone interested in learning I would recommend ‘Dorothy Heatcote- Learning through Drama’ by Betty Wagner.

 

3 Responses to Tribute to Dorothy Heathcote

  1. Pingback: Making the case for ‘Mantle of the Expert’ « Claque Theatre

  2. Geoffrey Marshall says:

    Dear Jon,

    John intoduced me to this tribute which of course is well deserved and to me of particular interest.

    My mind was opened to what I ought to try to do as a teacher in the sixties (quite some time before you) and one of the influences I met then was Marion North at the Laban Institute who intoduced us to something called ‘movement’, an entirely novel idea to us. We saw it in Primary Schools in West Riding and I remember one in particular in Castleford which then was a centre of the coal mining industry. We adopted it in our school and found it a natural and creative way to make children aware of the potential of their bodies for interpreting their ideas. It made a fascinating and obvious link between dance, drama and physical education and to me was an important preliminary to introducing speech into a dramatic situation.
    I wondered if, as a drama teacher, you had experience of ‘movement’ as understood by Marion North. It occurs to me that Dorothy Heathcote may well have known her since they were in related fields and I note that they shared similar public recognition for their work.

    It is interesting, I think, that alongside her work at the Laban Institute, she was also on the interviewing panels of a number of companies as an advisor observing what is now called ‘body language’ which she would have termed ‘movement’

    Regards,

    Geoff Marshall

    • admin says:

      I’m only vaquely aware of Marion North, but as a Froebel trained teacher, we all had to do Laban Dance in the first year – it was extraordinary how many people, who approached dance reluctantly took it up as their main subject. Ken Robinson points out that he doesn’t know of any school anywhere in the world that has dance at the top of the curriculum, maths, science or english yes, but not dance and he asks why – children love to dance. We would do well to help children find their ‘element’ the place where they flourish and support them in developing that which is natural to them, that they feel at home with. We all have individual talents and enthusiams, but we are often steered away from them because they are not deemed ‘useful’ . So few people discover their ‘element’ – unless it happens, by luck to be in the accademic top five. Why do we so scorn the creative arts? The qualities required to be creative are, as you suggest, what modern companies are looking for in their employees. It doesn’t make sense.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>